Monday, February 4, 2013

Hansel & Gretel: Fun, If A Bit Inauthentic, Entertainment

The trend in today's Hollywood is to pick a ready-made story and turn it into the next cash cow. Lord of The Rings, Harry Potter, the Hunger Games, Narnia, The Wizard of Oz, Peter Pan... all these were literature favourites that has seen transaction to the big screen. Some were transferred to the smaller screen, like the Game of Thrones.


Don't Mess With These Siblings
Fairy Tales are no exception. Over the years, we see stories from ancient folklores and the Grimms Brothers converted into box office movies with a little bit of Hollywood magic. Most of the good ones are animated versions, such as those made by Disney, one by New Line Cinema (Swan Princess) and another by 20th Century Fox (Anastasia). Only one live action adaptation that I know of is worth watching. Others, unfortunately, are not so commendable. Equally unfortunate, is that this category exceeds its commendable counterparts. Too many to mention and in too many variables to be able to digest.

The latest, and for now the only well-known, adaptation of Hansel and Gretel, actually falls close into the first category, although not without faults. The plot serves as a sort of extension to the story of the two siblings who were left in the forest by their father, only to encounter a house made of confectionery and almost be eaten by a witch. Both were under the impression that their parents had left them in the forest as children to die, though they didn't understand why.


Somebody call for an exterminator?
Fast forward to 15 years after the incident. Hansel is diabetic due to eating far too much sweets in the candy house, while Gretel has frequent dreams about their mother. The aftermath of their ordeal was that the siblings combined both their skills (they are immune to evil spells and witchcraft for unknown reasons) and knowledge (they learned various effective ways to trap and kill witches) and became expert witch hunters. News traveled fast and they became well-known across the lands (I'm assuming Germany).

After years of making a living as witch hunters, they came at last at a town blanketed in fear, for many children have been missing and word has it that witches are involved. They arrived just in time to stop the condemning of a young redheaded woman, Mina, who was accused of witchcraft. The siblings freed her, announcing that she has no mark of witchcraft on her. But there were indeed witches at large, and as it turned out, the missing children served a bigger purpose for the witches than just to make a feast.

I mentioned previously that this version of the story was quite good, because it talked about the siblings' psychological state after they almost became witch supper as children. The injection (no pun intended) of Hansel's diabetes was a brilliant touch, and it was implied that he never touched candy for the rest of his life. I also like the sibling relationship between Hansel and Gretel. Hansel's character was swashbuckling and all about action, though he softened and amusing when it comes to his sister. Gretel is thoughtful and sensitive, and spends most of her time trying to watch over her brother, despite everything that was happening around her.
That horrible moment when you 
realize you date is not pleased

Other characters worth mentioning had to be the Leader of the Evil Witches, Muriel, who seemed to know more about the siblings' past than they do. The redheaded Mina, who turned out to be a witch after all, but a good one, was passable (somebody had to romance at least one of the siblings I suppose), and so is the town Sherrif (equally, someone has to be the secondary, bumbling antagonist). I don't know why Ben the fanboy had to be there though. They can easily relate the tale of Hansel & Gretel's past in plenty other ways. Best had to be the Troll (I love the fact that they named him Edward! Much better looking that the cough*vampire*cough).


Say What?
However, on the other hand, a gattling gun and a taser in 18th century Europe in a tad too over the top. It would have been a lot more authentic if they had worked with super-huge swords and mega-huge crossbows. The firearms are all right, but putting a gattling gun and a witch on broomsticks in the same frame is just plain wrong.

So in short, this movie makes of good entertainment if you keep you mind wide open and don't worry about details. I would recommend to see it once, if only to drool over Jeremy Renner and/or Gemma Arterton.





Don't look now Hansel, but I think there's a creepy old lady behind us.


Tuesday, January 29, 2013

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Movie



I remember when I watched the first movie of the Lord of The Rings franchise, back in 2001. I was fresh out of the equally first of the Harry Potter movies, and at the time the two franchises were placed against one another in a form of media rivalry ( as it will be later in the future, for Harry Potter vs. Twilight, Twilight vs. the Hunger Games and so on)

The story of the Hobbit

The Hobbit is an extension of The Lord of The Ring, its prequel. Before Frodo set off on his journey to the pits of Mount Doom, the story of Middle Earth wasn't always about the Dark Lord Sauron or the One Ring, though as one may found out, they're interconnected with every other tale in that land. Before the Elves, Men, Dwarves, Hobbits and other creatures of the Light joined forces to protect the kingdom together from their mutual enemies, they very much minded their own businesses. Elves stayed in their forests or valleys, while Hobbits keep to their Shires. Wizards roamed the land, but precious little is known about this unique kind.

Gandalf & Radagast
Dwarves lived in the mountains, as fiercely protective of their domain as Elves were coolly hostile to intruders. In the War of The Ring, dwarves were featured very briefly as an active force against Sauron, taking part in the Battle of Dale alongside the Men of Dale against the Easterlings, but little elsewhere. This, of course, is with the exception of Gimli, a member of Durin's folk which represented the Dwarves in the Fellowship of Nine, and also forged a friendship with the Elf Prince Legolas, personifying the end of the age-old Dwarves-Elves hostility.On the other hand, Dwarves took center stage as the most prominent race throughout the Hobbit.

The Hobbit was set years prior to the events in the Lord of The Rings. We see Bilbo Baggins (far younger than we know in the LOTR movies, played by the delightful Martin Freeman), a well-off hobbit who was enjoying his bachelorhood and the comfort of his home. He encountered Gandalf (still the Grey at present), who unwittingly introduced him to a band of 13 dwarves. These dwarves were led by the grim leader Thorin Oakenshield, on a quest to reclaim their home under the Lonely Mountains, which had been pillaged by the dragon Smaug during the reign of Thorin's grandfather Thror. Bilbo was then hired as their burglar for a particular task of their expedition.

The first part of The Hobbit trilogy, in general, pretty much goes along the same line as The Fellowship of The Ring, in which it was the story of a group of people on a journey. I was, however, pleasantly surprise because the vibe is a lot less depressing and benign than it had been for the Fellowship of the Ring. Here are some of the thoughts that I had throughout the movie.

1. Martin Freeman is an excellent choice for Bilbo.
A young Bilbo Baggins
I love Martin Freeman as John Watson in BBC's Sherlock. He was fun to watch, the exasperated-yet-faithful partner of the belligerent, eccentric Holmes. In the Hobbit, he was often bewildered by his surroundings and his companions. But that does not seem to hinder his easygoing ways, not even when the imposing Thorin brushed him off as weak and homesick. Bilbo has a good heart, he is a Hobbit of the Shire through and through, but he does not hesitate to use trickery and even threat to save himself. I find him a nice balance of humour, simplicity and cunning, which is a nice change to the previous hobbits (which I will not criticize in this blog).

2. Gandalf had a lot more sense of humour before the One Ring was found.
Don't be fooled by that serious look
Gandalf is a wizard. So it is expected for a wizard in Middle Earth to be benign, even in light occasions  Tricking people and talking in ways that made other want to tear off the long white (or grey) hair is more reserved for wizards in another dimension (cough*Dumbledore*cough). So it's refreshing to see him talk in riddles and sending dwarves into a shocked Bilbo's house, just so they would clean off his (Bilbo's) larder.

3. Return of familiar characters
Thought you won't see me again eh, precious?
We all know Gollum is coming back, so is Elrond, Saruman and Galadriel. Even through previous press releases, we know Elijah Wood will make an appearance, even though the Hobbit is set before his time. But it still makes me smile when I see each and every one of them onscreen. Some scenes make you feel like you're living in time backwards, other scenes (like when Bilbo and Gollum were playing the Riddle game) makes you want to cry out "Don't go there!

Slight hitch: Where on earth is Legolas Greenleaf? We want more Legolas!!

4. There are actually some pretty good looking dwarves in Middle Earth
Look, in my defense, aside from the 30-second appearance of the dwarven representatives in Elrond's council in the Fellowship of the Ring, the only visible dwarf all throughout the trilogy had been Gimli. While I adore Gimli (he is funny as hell), I would not exactly trade Legolas or Faramir or even Aragorn for him in the looks department. The Hobbit actually showcases a pretty impressive lineup of dwarves, some even decent-looking too. My opinion is, if Snow White had seen these guys, she would have ditched Prince Charming, pronto.
Someone Called for a Good-looking Dwarve?

 In a way, I see it as a catch-up lesson on these mountainfolks. We have so much exposure to the Hobbits, Men and Elves in LOTR (even orcs have their share of glory in there), it's time to shine some spotlight on this race.

5. Oh Eagles! Where were you for the past two and a half hours of the movie?
Towards the end of the movie, at the very edge of mortal peril, Gandalf summoned his Eagle friends to carry their group away from Misty Mountains and from the group of orcs attacking them. And before that, they almost got eaten by Trolls, got in between a Stone Giant fight, captured and escaped a community of Goblins and, yes, being chased left right and center by Orcs on Wargs, its leader being Thorin's old foe. And here you are, at the edge of a cliff, the dwarves a slip away from falling to their deaths, the dwarven king nearly dead, with a hobbit between him and his Orc enemy, and...

Oh, wait a minute let me summoned my trusty gigantic winged friends. Really Gandalf, it's not as if there's the Eye to worry about this time around. Would have saved a lot of trouble if you had whistled for those birds way earlier.

But then, the movie would have been reduced to five minutes, plus credits, instead of the usual 3-hours.

 Great movie. I like how it's a lighter vibe than LOTR had been.


What the heck are you people doing in my house??

Monday, January 28, 2013

My New Favourite Song- But it has nothing to do with "You-Know-Which-Movie"


Heart beats fast
Colors and promises
How to be brave?
How can I love when I'm afraid to fall
But watching you stand alone?
All of my doubt suddenly goes away somehow

One step closer

[Chorus:]
I have died everyday waiting for you
Darling don't be afraid I have loved you
For a thousand years
I'll love you for a thousand more

Time stands still
Beauty in all she is
I will be brave
I will not let anything take away
What's standing in front of me
Every breath
Every hour has come to this

One step closer

[Chorus:]
I have died everyday waiting for you
Darling don't be afraid I have loved you
For a thousand years
I'll love you for a thousand more

And all along I believed I would find you
Time has brought your heart to me
I have loved you for a thousand years
I'll love you for a thousand more

One step closer
One step closer

[Chorus:]
I have died everyday waiting for you
Darling don't be afraid I have loved you
For a thousand years
I'll love you for a thousand more

And all along I believed I would find you
Time has brought your heart to me
I have loved you for a thousand years
I'll love you for a thousand more



I think this will be an awesome first dance song... along with 'All This Time" by OneRepublic

Monday, January 14, 2013

10 Myths about Introverts

Myths about introverts (According to The Introvert Advantage (How To Thrive In an Extrovert World), by Marti Lane, PsyD.
Credits to Carlkingdom.com


Myth#1–Introverts don’t like to talk.
This is not true. Introverts just don’t talk unless they have something to say. They hate small talk. Get an introvert talking about something they are interested in, and they won’t shut up for days.

Myth #2 – Introverts are shy.
Shyness has nothing to do with being an Introvert. Introverts are not necessarily afraid of people. What they need is a reason to interact. They don’t interact for the sake of interacting. If you want to talk to an Introvert, just start talking. Don’t worry about being polite.

Myth #3 – Introverts are rude.
Introverts often don’t see a reason for beating around the bush with social pleasantries. They want everyone to just be real and honest. Unfortunately, this is not acceptable in most settings, so Introverts can feel a lot of pressure to fit in, which they find exhausting.

Myth #4 – Introverts don’t like people.
On the contrary, Introverts intensely value the few friends they have. They can count their close friends on one hand. If you are lucky enough for an introvert to consider you a friend, you probably have a loyal ally for life. Once you have earned their respect as being a person of substance, you’re in.

Myth #5 – Introverts don’t like to go out in public.
Nonsense. Introverts just don’t like to go out in public FOR AS LONG. They also like to avoid the complications that are involved in public activities. They take in data and experiences very quickly, and as a result, don’t need to be there for long to “get it.” They’re ready to go home, recharge, and process it all. In fact, recharging is absolutely crucial for Introverts.

Myth #6 – Introverts always want to be alone.
Introverts are perfectly comfortable with their own thoughts. They think a lot. They daydream. They like to have problems to work on, puzzles to solve. But they can also get incredibly lonely if they don’t have anyone to share their discoveries with. They crave an authentic and sincere connection with ONE PERSON at a time.

Myth #7 – Introverts are weird.
Introverts are often individualists. They don’t follow the crowd. They’d prefer to be valued for their novel ways of living. They think for themselves and because of that, they often challenge the norm. They don’t make most decisions based on what is popular or trendy.

Myth #8 – Introverts are aloof nerds.
Introverts are people who primarily look inward, paying close attention to their thoughts and emotions. It’s not that they are incapable of paying attention to what is going on around them, it’s just that their inner world is much more stimulating and rewarding to them.

Myth #9 – Introverts don’t know how to relax and have fun.
Introverts typically relax at home or in nature, not in busy public places. Introverts are not thrill seekers and adrenaline junkies. If there is too much talking and noise going on, they shut down. Their brains are too sensitive to the neurotransmitter called Dopamine. Introverts and Extroverts have different dominant neuro-pathways. Just look it up.

Myth #10 – Introverts can fix themselves and become Extroverts.
A world without Introverts would be a world with few scientists, musicians, artists, poets, filmmakers, doctors, mathematicians, writers, and philosophers. That being said, there are still plenty of techniques an Extrovert can learn in order to interact with Introverts. (Yes, I reversed these two terms on purpose to show you how biased our society is.) Introverts cannot “fix themselves” and deserve respect for their natural temperament and contributions to the human race. In fact, one study (Silverman, 1986) showed that the percentage of Introverts increases with IQ.